In GRID, the Celeron 847 is same performance as the Core i7-5960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 17 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-5960X
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Sep 01, 2014 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
GRID FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i7-5960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$255.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-5960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-5960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
37%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
17W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
