In Atomfall, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3930K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 87% less energy – 17 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 87% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-3930K
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 months and 26 days newer – Nov 14, 2011 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 4 months and 26 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3930K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3930K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
34%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3930K Nov 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | $583.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA2011 |
17W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
