In Atomfall, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 78% less energy – 17 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 78% less energy
Core i7-3770
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer – Apr 29, 2012 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 10 months and 10 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3770: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
194 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
145 FPS
100%
Price, $
$80.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
32%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $278.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1155 |
17W | Power Consumption | 77W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
