In Atomfall, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i5-2550K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 17 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 82% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-2550K
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 196 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 11 days newer – Jan 30, 2012 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 7 months and 11 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i5-2550K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Average FPS
196 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i5-2550K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i5-2550K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
32%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-2550K
Jan 30th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-2550K Jan 30th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $235.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1155 |
17W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
