In Atomfall, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i3-9100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9100F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 208 vs 179 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 7 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i3-9100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
208 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
156 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i3-9100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i3-9100F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9100F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9100F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1151 |
17W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
