In Control, the Celeron 847 is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 847
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 17 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 4% faster in Control – 253 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Control
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 12 years and 6 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 847 vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
253 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
100%
Price, $
$96.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 847 vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 847 vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
31%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 19th, 2011 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1700 |
17 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
