In Deathloop, the Celeron 4205U is slightly faster than the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
