In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2640
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5-2640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5-2640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5-2640 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
13%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2640
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2640 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | LGA2011 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
