In Rust, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1270. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 7 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270
- Up to 1% faster in Rust – 210 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E3-1270: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E3-1270 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E3-1270 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | LGA1155 |
15W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
