In Control, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 1 year and 14 days newer – Feb 07, 2020 vs Jan 23, 2019
- Is 1 year and 14 days newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$2499.98
100%
Value, $/FPS
$10.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3990X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
3%
L3 Cache
2 MB
1%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Feb 7th, 2020
Cores
64-core
100%
L3 Cache
256 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X Feb 7th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 7th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $3,990.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | TRX4 |
15W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
