In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 3 months and 20 days newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Oct 03, 2018
- Is 3 months and 20 days newer
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 2920X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
51%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Oct 3rd, 2018
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Oct 3rd, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $649.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | SP3r2 |
15W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
