The Celeron 4205U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3400G. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3400G
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 5 3400G for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
92%
Min 1% FPS
111
92%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
180
100%
Min 1% FPS
120
100%
Price, $
$99.73
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 5 3400G in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 5 3400G in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 5 3400G in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
50%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Ryzen 5 3400G
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3400G |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $149.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Picasso |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.2 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
