In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Ryzen 3 4100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 4100
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer – Apr 04, 2022 vs Jan 23, 2019
- Is 3 years and 2 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 3 4100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Average FPS
212 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
100%
Price, $
$69
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 3 4100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Ryzen 3 4100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen 3 4100
Apr 4th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 3 4100 Apr 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AM4 |
15W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
