In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the FX-6200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-6200
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs FX-6200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-6200 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
