In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the FX-6100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 7 years and 3 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-6100
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall – 186 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs FX-6100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
100%
Price, $
$33.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6100 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
