In Atomfall, the Celeron 4205U is slightly slower than the Core i5-760. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 4205U
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer – Jan 23, 2019 vs Jul 18, 2010
- Is 8 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-760
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-760: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$77.66
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-760 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-760 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
64%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-760
Jul 18th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 4205U Jan 23rd, 2019 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-760 Jul 18th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 18th, 2010 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | LGA1156 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
