The Celeron 4205U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-4670. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Celeron 4205U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy – 15 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of the Core i5-4670
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 4 vs 2 threads
Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-4670 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
165
91%
Min 1% FPS
111
92%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Average FPS
182
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, $
$29.93
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-4670 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-4670 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 4205U vs Core i5-4670 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 4205U
Jan 23rd, 2019
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
33%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Celeron 4205U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-4670 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1528 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
| Whiskey Lake | Codename | Haswell |
15 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
| 2 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2133 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 620 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
