In Deathloop, the Celeron 3965U is same performance as the Xeon W3530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon W3530
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Xeon W3530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon W3530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon W3530 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon W3530
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3530 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
