In Rust, the Celeron 3965U is same performance as the Xeon E5645. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5645
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5645: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5645 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5645 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5645
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5645 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
