In Control, the Celeron 3965U is same performance as the Xeon E5-2620. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2620
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5-2620: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
100%
![Intel Xeon E5-2620 V4 Octa-core [8 Core] 2.10 Ghz Processor - Socket R3 [lga2011-3]oem Pack - 2 Mb - 20 Mb Cache - 8 Gt/s Qpi - 64-bit Processing - 3 Ghz Overclocking Speed - 14 Nm - 85 W -](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B0745CL6NF.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5-2620 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E5-2620 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
13%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2620
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2620 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA2011 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
