In Valorant, the Celeron 3965U is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1270 v3. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 15 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 81% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Up to 12% faster in Valorant – 573 vs 511 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in Valorant
Valorant FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E3-1270 v3: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E3-1270 v3 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Xeon E3-1270 v3 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 v3 Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1150 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3, DDR4 |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
