In Control, the Celeron 3965U is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 3960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 249 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 2 years and 10 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$870.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.49/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1614
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
12035
100%
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $1,399.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | TRX4 |
15W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
