In GRID, the Celeron 3965U is same performance as the FX-8150. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 5 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-8150
No clear advantages
GRID FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs FX-8150: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
483 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
291 FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.29
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs FX-8150 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs FX-8150 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8150
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8150 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
