In Rust, the Celeron 3965U is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 36% faster in Rust – 284 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 13 days newer – Jan 16, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 13 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$560
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 16th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 16th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 16th, 2025 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1851 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
