In Rust, the Celeron 3965U is slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 33% faster in Rust – 278 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Rust
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 8 years and 4 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
278 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
7%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
33%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1851 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
