In Atomfall, the Celeron 3965U is slower than the Core i9-14900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900KF
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Atomfall
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 6 years and 9 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$429.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-14900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i9-14900KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
