In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3965U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-11900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-11900F
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-11900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-11900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-11900F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Core i9-11900F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-11900F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $422.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
