In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Celeron 3965U is slightly slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 109 vs 93 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
