In The Last of Us Part II, the Celeron 3965U is faster than the Core i7-14700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3965U
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 21% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700F
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 years and 4 days newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Celeron 3965U vs Core i7-14700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
169 FPS
83%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
83%
Price, $
$302.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i7-14700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3965U vs Core i7-14700F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3965U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
38%
Core i7-14700F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3965U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $359.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
