Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Celeron 3965U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 2093 days newer than Celeron 3965U.
Advantages of Celeron 3965U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700K - 15 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 60% better in New World than Celeron 3965U - 157 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3965U - 24 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$309
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 288 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3965U | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |