In Atomfall, the Celeron 3865U is slightly slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy – 15 vs 180 Watts
- Consumes up to 92% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 5 days newer – Aug 10, 2017 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 7 months and 5 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
157 FPS
100%
Price, $
$850
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3865U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
6%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3865U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Aug 10th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | SP3r2 |
15W | Power Consumption | 180W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
