In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3865U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen 9 5950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 15 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 86% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 9 5950X
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6 – 103 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 69% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen 9 5950X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen 9 5950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3865U vs Ryzen 9 5950X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3865U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
2 MB
3%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
53%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Ryzen 9 5950X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3865U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5950X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AM4 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
