In Atomfall, the Celeron 3865U is slightly slower than the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3865U
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-8300
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3865U vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
189 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3865U vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3865U vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3865U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
87%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3865U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
