In Atomfall, the Celeron 3865U is slightly slower than the Core i7-10700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3865U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700KF
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall – 219 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 18% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 03, 2017
- Is 3 years and 3 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3865U vs Core i7-10700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3865U vs Core i7-10700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3865U vs Core i7-10700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3865U
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
12%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
47%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
73%
Core i7-10700KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3865U Jan 3rd, 2017 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1356 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3, 2133 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD Graphics 610 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
