In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-2690. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Mar 06, 2012
- Is 2 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 15 vs 135 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-2690
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 187 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E5-2690: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$58.9
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E5-2690 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E5-2690 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E5-2690
Mar 6th, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-2690 Mar 6th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA2011 |
15W | Power Consumption | 135W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
