In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is slightly slower than the Xeon E3-1280. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1280
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 193 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E3-1280: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E3-1280 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Xeon E3-1280 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
43%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1280
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1280 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1155 |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
