In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is quite a bit slower than the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 96% less energy – 15 vs 350 Watts
- Consumes up to 96% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
- Up to 36% faster in Atomfall – 248 vs 182 FPS
- Up to 36% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jul 30, 2025 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Average FPS
248 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
186 FPS
100%
Price, $
$1409.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3108
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
25837
100%
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Ryzen Threadripper 9960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
36%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
25%
Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Jul 30th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 9960X Jul 30th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 30th, 2025 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $1,499.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | sTR5 |
15W | Power Consumption | 350W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
