Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Celeron 3205U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1589 days newer than Celeron 3205U.
Advantages of Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 9% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron 3205U - 118 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 3205U - 12 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
118
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron 3205U | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |