In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is slightly slower than the FX-8370. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Is 5 months and 27 days newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Sep 02, 2014
- Is 5 months and 27 days newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-8370
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall – 191 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs FX-8370: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-8370 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-8370 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
86%
FX-8370
Sep 2nd, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8370 Sep 2nd, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
$107.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
