In Deathloop, the Celeron 3205U is slightly faster than the FX-8120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Oct 12, 2011
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-8120
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs FX-8120: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Average FPS
222 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
98%
Price, $
$38.1
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-8120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-8120 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8120
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8120 Oct 12th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
