In Minecraft, the Celeron 3205U is same performance as the FX-6200. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Is 3 years and 2 days newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Feb 27, 2012
- Is 3 years and 2 days newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-6200
No clear advantages
Minecraft FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs FX-6200: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Average FPS
1059 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
100%
Price, $
$32.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.03/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-6200 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs FX-6200 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
39%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-6200
Feb 27th, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6200 Feb 27th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
