In Battlefield 6, the Celeron 3205U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Core i9-10850K
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6 – 89 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 41% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jul 27, 2020 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Core i9-10850K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
55%
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K Jul 27th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1200 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
