In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is slightly slower than the Core i7-980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 4 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-980X
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 192 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Average FPS
192 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
144 FPS
100%
Price, $
$189.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
45%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1366 |
15W | Power Consumption | 130W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | DDR3 |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
