In Deathloop, the Celeron 3205U is slightly faster than the Core i7-5960X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 219 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Deathloop
- Is 5 months and 28 days newer – Mar 01, 2015 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 5 months and 28 days newer
- Consumes up to 89% less energy – 15 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 89% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-5960X
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-5960X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
219 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
96%
Price, $
$255.05
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.16/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-5960X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i7-5960X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
50%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
75%
Core i7-5960X
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-5960X Sep 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
15W | Power Consumption | 140W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
