In Atomfall, the Celeron 3205U is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 3205U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall – 210 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Mar 01, 2015
- Is 3 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Celeron 3205U vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
210 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 3205U vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 3205U
Mar 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
22%
Base Frequency
1.5 GHz
52%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 3205U Mar 1st, 2015 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 1st, 2015 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| $107.00 | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1151 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
