In Deathloop, the Celeron 2955U is slightly faster than the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 2955U
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 95% less energy – 15 vs 280 Watts
- Consumes up to 95% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Nov 25, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 2955U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Average FPS
224 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
99%
Price, $
$1629.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$7.27/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 2955U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1652
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
13962
100%
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 2955U vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
6%
L3 Cache
2 MB
2%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Nov 25th, 2019
Cores
32-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Nov 25th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,999.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | TRX4 |
15W | Power Consumption | 280W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
