In Deathloop, the Celeron 2955U is slightly faster than the FX-8350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 2955U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 225 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
FX-8350
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 2955U vs FX-8350: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
220 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
98%
Price, $
$258.02
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 2955U vs FX-8350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 2955U vs FX-8350 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
35%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8350
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8350 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $199.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
