In Control, the Celeron 2955U is same performance as the FX-8300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 2955U
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
FX-8300
No clear advantages
Control FPS Calculator
Celeron 2955U vs FX-8300: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
100%
Price, $
$106.06
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 2955U vs FX-8300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 2955U vs FX-8300 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-8300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-8300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | AM3+ |
15W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
