In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Celeron 2955U is slower than the Core i3-14100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 2955U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 15 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-14100F
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 117 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 10 years and 4 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Celeron 2955U vs Core i3-14100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 2955U vs Core i3-14100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 2955U vs Core i3-14100F in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 2955U
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
40%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 2955U Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $109.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG2 (988B) | Socket | LGA1700 |
15W | Power Consumption | 58W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
