In Deathloop, the Celeron 1037U is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Celeron 1037U
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 226 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer – Jan 20, 2013 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 3 years and 9 months newer
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 17 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Celeron 1037U vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Celeron 1037U vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Celeron 1037U vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Celeron 1037U
Jan 20th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
2 MB
25%
Base Frequency
1.8 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Celeron 1037U Jan 20th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $530.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | LGA1366 |
17W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
